Ching‐Hsing Wang

462 citations
31 papers · 280 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Ching‐Hsing Wang

25 papers receiving 269 citations

Peers

Ching‐Hsing Wang
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Communication 44
  • Health 43
  • Political Science and International Relations 88
  • Sociology and Political Science 157
  • Clinical Psychology 56
Replace Andrea Pedrazzani with:
Andrea Pedrazzani Italy
Paolo Segatti Italy
Conrad Ziller Germany
Audun Fladmoe Norway
Masha Krupenkin United States
Luis Bouza García Spain
Melissa Hickman Barlow United States
Dan Cassino United States
Marina Ghersetti Sweden
Anne Aly Australia
Ching‐Hsing Wang relative to Andrea Pedrazzani Italy Andrea Pedrazzani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Andrea Pedrazzani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ching‐Hsing Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ching‐Hsing Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching‐Hsing Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching‐Hsing Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ching‐Hsing Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching‐Hsing Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching‐Hsing Wang. The network helps show where Ching‐Hsing Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Ching‐Hsing Wang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ching‐Hsing Wang Line = papers co-authored together Ching‐Hsing Wang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201563
2 202048
3 201226
4 201626
5 201316
6 201314
7 201612
8 201910
9 20208
10 20188
11 20198
12 20235
13 20155
14 20174
15 20194
16 20174
17 20223
18
The Texas Voter ID Law and the 2014 Election: A Study of Texas's 23rd Congressional District
20153
19 20182
20 20232

About Ching‐Hsing Wang

Ching‐Hsing Wang is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Clinical Psychology, Communication and Gender Studies, having authored 31 papers that have together received 280 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (16 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (10 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers), Social Media and Politics (6 papers), Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (5 papers), Social Capital and Networks (4 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (4 papers) and Gender Politics and Representation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (44 citations), Health (43 citations), Political Science and International Relations (88 citations), Sociology and Political Science (157 citations) and Clinical Psychology (56 citations). Ching‐Hsing Wang has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Fang‐Yu Lin, Aldo F. Ponce, Yuan Hsiao, Jim Granato, Mark P. Jones, Costas Panagopoulos and M. C. Sunny Wong. Their work appears in journals such as Electoral Studies, Japanese Journal of Political Science, Sexuality Research and Social Policy, Democratization and Party Politics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact