Ching‐Feng Li
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Forest ecology and management
Papers in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 14
-
- Botany and Plant Ecology Studies 8
- Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies 2
- Co-authors
- David Zelený (13 shared papers)Milan Chytrý (7 shared papers)Chang‐Fu Hsieh (4 shared papers)Yuan‐Yao Li (1 shared paper)Chia‐Yen Hsu (1 shared paper)Mark J. Costello (1 shared paper)Robert K. Colwell (1 shared paper)Yasuhiro Kubota (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Ching‐Feng Li
22 papers receiving 816 citations
Ching‐Feng Li's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Ecological Modeling 168
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 385
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 229
- Ecology 293
- Global and Planetary Change 196
Countries citing papers authored by Ching‐Feng Li
This map shows the geographic impact of Ching‐Feng Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching‐Feng Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching‐Feng Li more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ching‐Feng Li
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching‐Feng Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching‐Feng Li. The network helps show where Ching‐Feng Li may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ching‐Feng Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Quantifying sample completeness and comparing diversities among assemblages Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 209 |
| 2 | 2013 | 97 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 85 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 81 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 54 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 49 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 37 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 31 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 30 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 29 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 24 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 23 | |
| 13 | Niche Relationships of Carnivores in a Subtropical Primary Forest in Southern Taiwan | 2012 | 21 |
| 14 | 2014 | 16 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 11 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 3 |
About Ching‐Feng Li
Ching‐Feng Li is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science, Ecology, Ecological Modeling and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 22 papers that have together received 836 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (14 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (8 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (6 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (3 papers), Remote Sensing in Agriculture (3 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (3 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (2 papers) and Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (168 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (385 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (229 citations), Ecology (293 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (196 citations). Ching‐Feng Li has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Czechia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David Zelený, Milan Chytrý, Chang‐Fu Hsieh, Yuan‐Yao Li, Chia‐Yen Hsu, Mark J. Costello, Robert K. Colwell, Yasuhiro Kubota, Anne Chao and Moriaki Yasuhara. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Vegetation Science, Journal of Vegetation Science, PLoS ONE, Acta Oecologica and Metals.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.