Ching‐Ching Yang

604 citations
62 papers · 429 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Ching‐Ching Yang

57 papers receiving 420 citations

Peers

Ching‐Ching Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 180
  • Oral Surgery 18
  • Radiation 23
  • Biomedical Engineering 102
  • Health Informatics 2
Replace Masanao Kobayashi with:
Masanao Kobayashi Japan
Hyo-Min Cho South Korea
Artur Omar Sweden
Lin Fu United States
Katrien Van Slambrouck Belgium
Daniel Prell Germany
Shaoyu Wang China
Moein Mozaffarzadeh Iran
Xiaoxuan Zhang United States
James A. Smith United States
Ching‐Ching Yang relative to Masanao Kobayashi Japan Masanao Kobayashi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Masanao Kobayashi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ching‐Ching Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ching‐Ching Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching‐Ching Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching‐Ching Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ching‐Ching Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching‐Ching Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching‐Ching Yang. The network helps show where Ching‐Ching Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ching‐Ching Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ching‐Ching Yang Line = papers co-authored together Ching‐Ching Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202148
2 201034
3 201334
4 201122
5 201220
6 201718
7 202017
8 202215
9 201314
10 201013
11 201913
12 201811
13 201010
14 201610
15 20128
16 20198
17 20067
18 20147
19 20157
20 20167

About Ching‐Ching Yang

Ching‐Ching Yang is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Radiation, Biomedical Engineering and Computational Mechanics, having authored 62 papers that have together received 429 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiation Dose and Imaging (14 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (13 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (10 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (6 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (5 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (5 papers), Image and Signal Denoising Methods (4 papers) and Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (180 citations), Oral Surgery (18 citations), Radiation (23 citations), Biomedical Engineering (102 citations) and Health Informatics (2 citations). Ching‐Ching Yang has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Macao and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kuo‐Cheng Huang, Wen-Tse Hsiao, Tung-Hsin Wu, Greta S. P. Mok, Chii-Rong Yang, Chun‐Li Chang, Jiu‐Jenq Lin, Tai-Shan Liao, Tung‐Wu Lu and Kiang Hiong Tay. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment, Academic Radiology, PLoS ONE and Nuclear Medicine Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact