Ching‐Chieh Su

3.9k citations
17 papers · 310 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Ching‐Chieh Su

17 papers receiving 304 citations

Peers

Ching‐Chieh Su
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 99
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 19
  • Biochemistry 26
  • Dermatology 36
  • Ophthalmology 35
Replace Yunjun Ruan with:
Yunjun Ruan China
Anna Bryl Poland
LA Velloso Brazil
Woong-Sun Yoo South Korea
Sanjana Kumariya India
Hyeon‐Ji Kang South Korea
Regina Maria Vieira da Costa Guaragna Brazil
Álvaro San Hipólito‐Luengo Spain
Shandong Ye China
Alli M. Nuotio-Antar United States
Ching‐Chieh Su relative to Yunjun Ruan China Yunjun Ruan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Yunjun Ruan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ching‐Chieh Su

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ching‐Chieh Su's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching‐Chieh Su with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching‐Chieh Su more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ching‐Chieh Su

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching‐Chieh Su. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching‐Chieh Su. The network helps show where Ching‐Chieh Su may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ching‐Chieh Su, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ching‐Chieh Su Line = papers co-authored together Ching‐Chieh Su links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201558
2 201050
3 201249
4 201135
5 200621
6 200319
7 201718
8 201914
9 201412
10 201412
11 201010
12 20225
13 20202
14 20102
15 20111
16 20231
17 20151

About Ching‐Chieh Su

Ching‐Chieh Su is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Ophthalmology, Ecology and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetes Treatment and Management (3 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (2 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (2 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers), Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine (2 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (2 papers) and Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (99 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (19 citations), Biochemistry (26 citations), Dermatology (36 citations) and Ophthalmology (35 citations). Ching‐Chieh Su has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Chi‐Feng Hung, Te‐Lin Hsia, Chien‐Yu Hsiao, Chi‐Ming Chan, Dee Pei, Yumay Chen, Cheng-Hua Huang, Ping H. Wang, Wen‐Ya Ma and Chieh‐Chen Huang. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Molecular Sciences, American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Scientific Reports, The FASEB Journal and Primary care diabetes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact