Ching‐Chan Lin

32 papers receiving 516 citations

Peers

Ching‐Chan Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Hematology 95
  • Otorhinolaryngology 32
  • Cancer Research 90
  • Oncology 112
  • Genetics 35
Replace Kartik Sehgal with:
Kartik Sehgal United States
Jameel Muzaffar United States
Andrea Kerkhoff Germany
Anne‐Marie Maddox United States
Lisa A. Speicher United States
Emily Curran United States
Stacey S. O’Neill United States
Anupam Sarma India
Corina Oprea France
Rajnish Nagarkar India
Ching‐Chan Lin relative to Kartik Sehgal United States Kartik Sehgal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Kartik Sehgal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ching‐Chan Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ching‐Chan Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching‐Chan Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching‐Chan Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ching‐Chan Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching‐Chan Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching‐Chan Lin. The network helps show where Ching‐Chan Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ching‐Chan Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ching‐Chan Lin Line = papers co-authored together Ching‐Chan Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201668
2 201848
3 201743
4 202240
5 201739
6 201234
7 202030
8 201729
9 202417
10 202417
11 202017
12 201413
13
Resveratrol-mediated ADAM9 degradation decreases cancer progression and provides synergistic effects in combination with chemotherapy.
202012
14 202210
15 201810
16 20229
17 20159
18 20238
19 20237
20 20247

About Ching‐Chan Lin

Ching‐Chan Lin is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Surgery, Otorhinolaryngology and Hematology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 520 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Head and Neck Cancer Studies (5 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (4 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (3 papers), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (3 papers), Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies (3 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (3 papers), Urologic and reproductive health conditions (2 papers) and Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hematology (95 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (32 citations), Cancer Research (90 citations), Oncology (112 citations) and Genetics (35 citations). Ching‐Chan Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Su‐Peng Yeh, Ching-Yun Hsieh, Li‐Yuan Bai, Chen‐Yuan Lin, Yuh‐Pyng Sher, Chang‐Fang Chiu, Wei‐Chao Chang, Chi‐Ping Huang, Chi‐Rei Yang and Chao‐Jung Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, BMC Cancer, Leukemia Research, Molecular Oncology and Biomedicines.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact