Chi-Kit Wat

1.5k citations
26 papers · 1.2k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Chi-Kit Wat

26 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Chi-Kit Wat
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Insect Science 161
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 312
  • Biotechnology 92
  • Plant Science 397
  • Cancer Research 136
Replace Setsuo Takeuchi with:
Setsuo Takeuchi Japan
Jung Min Park South Korea
Ninghui Cheng United States
Masayasu Kurono Japan
Soohyun Um South Korea
Youzhi Li China
Fumiko Taguchi Japan
Line Cantin Canada
Qianjin Kang China
John C. Chabala United States
Chi-Kit Wat relative to Setsuo Takeuchi Japan Setsuo Takeuchi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Setsuo Takeuchi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chi-Kit Wat

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chi-Kit Wat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chi-Kit Wat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chi-Kit Wat more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chi-Kit Wat

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chi-Kit Wat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chi-Kit Wat. The network helps show where Chi-Kit Wat may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chi-Kit Wat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chi-Kit Wat Line = papers co-authored together Chi-Kit Wat links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1983259
2 198191
3
Ability of specific monoclonal antibodies and conventional antisera conjugated to hematoporphyrin to label and kill selected cell lines subsequent to light activation.
198586
4 198176
5 197771
6 197968
7 198165
8 198060
9 197453
10 198046
11 198041
12 197940
13 198736
14 197633
15 198431
16 198030
17 198128
18 197926
19 198620
20 197515

About Chi-Kit Wat

Chi-Kit Wat is a scholar working on Plant Science, Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Food Science and Cancer Research, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (6 papers), Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies (5 papers), Plant chemical constituents analysis (4 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (4 papers), Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (3 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (3 papers), Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions (3 papers) and Marine Sponges and Natural Products (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (161 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (312 citations), Biotechnology (92 citations), Plant Science (397 citations) and Cancer Research (136 citations). Chi-Kit Wat has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Denmark and Germany. Frequent co-authors include G.H.N. Towers, Daphne Mew, J G Levy, T. J. Arnason, Elizabeth Graham, Jordan Lam, L. C. Vining, Donald G. Smith, A. G. McInnes and Jeffrey L. C. Wright. Their work appears in journals such as Phytochemistry, Photochemistry and Photobiology, Canadian Journal of Chemistry, Plant and Soil and Journal of Natural Products.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact