Chie‐Pein Chen

2.2k citations
52 papers · 1.5k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Chie‐Pein Chen

50 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Chie‐Pein Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 383
  • Genetics 188
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 271
  • Developmental Neuroscience 26
  • Immunology 134
Replace N.M. Gude with:
N.M. Gude Australia
Asok Antony United States
Ming‐Kwang Shyu Taiwan
Nobuo Matsuura Japan
Shi‐Wen Jiang China
Lei Su China
Sheldon P. Rothenberg United States
Rekha Bajoria United Kingdom
Sho Matsubara Japan
Chie‐Pein Chen relative to N.M. Gude Australia N.M. Gude's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
N.M. Gude · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chie‐Pein Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chie‐Pein Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chie‐Pein Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chie‐Pein Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chie‐Pein Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chie‐Pein Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chie‐Pein Chen. The network helps show where Chie‐Pein Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chie‐Pein Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chie‐Pein Chen Line = papers co-authored together Chie‐Pein Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019249
2 200580
3 201579
4 201075
5 200668
6 200961
7 200753
8 201751
9 201049
10 201848
11 200845
12 200743
13 200541
14 201432
15 201531
16 202230
17 201530
18 201027
19 200626
20 199526

About Chie‐Pein Chen

Chie‐Pein Chen is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Immunology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (16 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (5 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (5 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (4 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (4 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (4 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (3 papers) and MicroRNA in disease regulation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (383 citations), Genetics (188 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (271 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (26 citations) and Immunology (134 citations). Chie‐Pein Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Chen‐Yu Chen, Chia‐Chen Chang, Chii‐Wann Lin, Tsung‐Hsien Su, Yuh‐Ming Hwu, Cheng-Yi Chen, Hung‐Sheng Chen, Pei‐Chun Chen, Hung Li and Jian‐Pei Huang. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, Oncotarget and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact