Chi-De Chen

1.0k citations
13 papers · 894 · h-index 12

Impact in

    • MicroRNA in disease regulation
    • Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
    • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

Papers in

Chi-De Chen

13 papers receiving 882 citations

Peers

Chi-De Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Cancer Research 177
  • Spectroscopy 196
  • Molecular Biology 447
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 88
  • Oncology 115
Replace M. Amneus with:
M. Amneus United States
Chiao‐Yun Lin Taiwan
Qiong Fu China
Mario W. Kramer Germany
Patricia A. Gonzales United States
John Corr Ireland
S. Hautmann Germany
Susan B. Liu United States
Chih‐Liang Wang Taiwan
Tatsuo Nakagawa Japan
Chi-De Chen relative to M. Amneus United States M. Amneus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
M. Amneus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chi-De Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chi-De Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chi-De Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chi-De Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chi-De Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chi-De Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chi-De Chen. The network helps show where Chi-De Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chi-De Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chi-De Chen Line = papers co-authored together Chi-De Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2012184
2 2010181
3 2010131
4 200495
5 201172
6 200959
7 201149
8 201532
9 201431
10 200721
11 202218
12 201712
13 20159

About Chi-De Chen

Chi-De Chen is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Spectroscopy and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 13 papers that have together received 894 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (3 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (2 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (2 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (2 papers), Thyroid Disorders and Treatments (2 papers), Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies (2 papers) and Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (177 citations), Spectroscopy (196 citations), Molecular Biology (447 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (88 citations) and Oncology (115 citations). Chi-De Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Jau‐Song Yu, Chih‐Ching Wu, Yu‐Sun Chang, Chia‐Wei Hsu, Chia‐Jung Yu, Yi‐Ting Chen, Ting Chung, Hsiao‐Wei Chen, Chien‐Lun Chen and Phei‐Lang Chang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Proteome Research, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, Endocrinology, Analytical Biochemistry and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact