Cheryl Lin

31 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Cheryl Lin's Hit Papers

Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review 2020 · 615 citations
6150+2+4Years since publication200400600

Peers

Cheryl Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Health 659
  • Modeling and Simulation 163
  • Family Practice 50
  • Infectious Diseases 302
  • Internal Medicine 41
Replace Katherine Mackey with:
Katherine Mackey United States
Venkatesh Avula United States
Durgesh Chaudhary United States
Pip Divall United Kingdom
Avi Israeli Israel
Shirley Sze United Kingdom
Monita Karmakar United States
James Doidge United Kingdom
Isuru Ranasinghe Australia
Katrina Brown United Kingdom
Cheryl Lin relative to Katherine Mackey United States Katherine Mackey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Katherine Mackey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl Lin. The network helps show where Cheryl Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cheryl Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cheryl Lin Line = papers co-authored together Cheryl Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review
Hit paper breakdown →
2020615
2 2012192
3 2021114
4 2017113
5 2020109
6 201237
7 201833
8 201226
9 202122
10 201122
11 201121
12 202020
13 201919
14 202218
15 201916
16 202216
17 201214
18 202311
19 201511
20 202011

About Cheryl Lin

Cheryl Lin is a scholar working on Health, Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (8 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (5 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (5 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (4 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (3 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (2 papers) and COVID-19 epidemiological studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (659 citations), Modeling and Simulation (163 citations), Family Practice (50 citations), Infectious Diseases (302 citations) and Internal Medicine (41 citations). Cheryl Lin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Pikuei Tu, Leslie M. Beitsch, Jewel Mullen, Leah L. Zullig, Hayden B. Bosworth, Lee H. Schwamm, DaiWai M. Olson, Gregg C. Fonarow, Rachel Clark and Eric D. Peterson. Their work appears in journals such as Vaccines, Journal of Personalized Medicine, Journal of the American Heart Association, Journal of Global Health and Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact