Cheryl Lin

31 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Cheryl Lin's Hit Papers

Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review 2020 · 637 citations
6370+2+4Years since publication200400600

Peers

Cheryl Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Health 684
  • Modeling and Simulation 165
  • Family Practice 51
  • Infectious Diseases 317
  • Internal Medicine 39
Replace Venkatesh Avula with:
Venkatesh Avula United States
Pip Divall United Kingdom
Ross D. Silverman United States
Avi Israeli Israel
Norrisa Haynes United States
Stan Xu United States
Monita Karmakar United States
Katrina Brown United Kingdom
Daniel G. Fort United States
Paul Frappé France
Cheryl Lin relative to Venkatesh Avula United States Venkatesh Avula's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.2×
Venkatesh Avula · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl Lin. The network helps show where Cheryl Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cheryl Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cheryl Lin Line = papers co-authored together Cheryl Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review
Hit paper breakdown →
2020637
2 2012211
3 2021124
4 2017119
5 2020112
6 201242
7 201836
8 201232
9 202027
10 201126
11 201125
12 202123
13 201921
14 202218
15 202218
16 201916
17 201215
18 201513
19 202313
20 202012

About Cheryl Lin

Cheryl Lin is a scholar working on Health, Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Family Practice and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (8 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (5 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (5 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (4 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (2 papers), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (2 papers) and Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (684 citations), Modeling and Simulation (165 citations), Family Practice (51 citations), Infectious Diseases (317 citations) and Internal Medicine (39 citations). Cheryl Lin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Pikuei Tu, Leslie M. Beitsch, Jewel Mullen, Hayden Barry Bosworth, Leah L. Zullig, DaiWai Olson, Gregg Fonarow, Lee H. Schwamm, Eric David Peterson and Rachel Ellen Clark. Their work appears in journals such as Vaccines, Journal of Personalized Medicine, Journal of the American Heart Association, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment and Journal of Global Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact