Cheryl Grim

751 citations
18 papers · 371 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Cheryl Grim

16 papers receiving 340 citations

Peers

Cheryl Grim
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 110
  • Economics and Econometrics 317
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 44
  • Accounting 63
  • Finance 37
Replace Jan M. Podivinsky with:
Jan M. Podivinsky United Kingdom
Daniel Garcia-Macia United States
Michael Siemer United States
Ding Ding United States
Giammario Impullitti United Kingdom
Armand Fouejieu United States
Lucy Qian Liu United States
Anna Maria Ferragina Italy
Kun‐Young Yun United States
Antonio Minniti Italy
Cheryl Grim relative to Jan M. Podivinsky United Kingdom Jan M. Podivinsky's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Jan M. Podivinsky · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl Grim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl Grim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl Grim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl Grim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl Grim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl Grim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl Grim. The network helps show where Cheryl Grim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Cheryl Grim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cheryl Grim Line = papers co-authored together Cheryl Grim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2015169
2 201643
3 201327
4 201824
5 202119
6 201217
7 201017
8 201916
9 20087
10 20116
11 20156
12 20075
13 20215
14 20165
15 20223
16 20151
17 19851
18
Internal Labor Markets and Diversification Strategies in Financial Services
20070

About Cheryl Grim

Cheryl Grim is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Management of Technology and Innovation, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Strategy and Management, having authored 18 papers that have together received 371 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Firm Innovation and Growth (13 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (8 papers), Global trade and economics (7 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (6 papers), Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (2 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (2 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (2 papers) and Intellectual Property and Patents (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (110 citations), Economics and Econometrics (317 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (44 citations), Accounting (63 citations) and Finance (37 citations). Cheryl Grim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Lucia Foster, John Haltiwanger, Zoltán Wolf, Steven J. Davis, Alan C. Marco, Nikolas Zolas, Javier Miranda, Stuart J.H. Graham, Mary L. Streitwieser and Randy A. Becker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, American Economic Review, American Economic Journal Macroeconomics, Journal of Labor Economics and Review of Income and Wealth.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact