Chenxia Sheng

613 citations
16 papers · 546 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

    • S100 Proteins and Annexins 1
    • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms 4
    • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances 2

Chenxia Sheng

16 papers receiving 542 citations

Peers

Chenxia Sheng
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Biological Psychiatry 30
  • Pharmacology 96
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 66
  • Neurology 53
  • Developmental Neuroscience 19
Replace Qin Yang with:
Qin Yang China
Pu Xu China
Jiankang Fang Macao
Liudi Yang China
Xiaodong Chao China
Xiaomin Wu China
Huaizhou Qin China
Haiyan Hu China
Chenxia Sheng relative to Qin Yang China Qin Yang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Qin Yang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chenxia Sheng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chenxia Sheng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chenxia Sheng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chenxia Sheng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chenxia Sheng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chenxia Sheng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chenxia Sheng. The network helps show where Chenxia Sheng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chenxia Sheng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chenxia Sheng Line = papers co-authored together Chenxia Sheng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201695
2 201673
3 201757
4 201547
5 201542
6 201535
7 201231
8 201726
9 201524
10 201822
11 201619
12 201719
13 201517
14 201917
15 201616
16 20206

About Chenxia Sheng

Chenxia Sheng is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Neurology, Physiology, Neurology and Pharmacology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 546 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (4 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers), Medicinal Plant Pharmacodynamics Research (2 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (1 paper), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (1 paper), Sunflower and Safflower Cultivation (1 paper) and S100 Proteins and Annexins (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (30 citations), Pharmacology (96 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (66 citations), Neurology (53 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (19 citations). Chenxia Sheng has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Weijun Peng, Zhe Wang, Chunhu Zhang, Xingui Xiong, Yang Wang, Rong Fan, Yang Wang, Panpan Xu, Wei Gong and Zian Xia. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Scientific Reports, Molecular Neurobiology and Stem Cell Research & Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact