Cheng‐I Yang

21 papers receiving 289 citations

Peers

Cheng‐I Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Research and Theory 70
  • Leadership and Management 14
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 9
  • Clinical Psychology 76
  • Gender Studies 26
Replace Amara Sundus with:
Amara Sundus Canada
Maxime Paquet Canada
Fiona McDermid Australia
Anita Fitzgerald United States
Connie Vance United States
Suzette J. Poole New Zealand
Janice Waddell Canada
Susan M. Hunter Revell United States
Kirsi Talman Finland
Lesley M. Smith Canada
Cheng‐I Yang relative to Amara Sundus Canada Amara Sundus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Amara Sundus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cheng‐I Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cheng‐I Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheng‐I Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheng‐I Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cheng‐I Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheng‐I Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheng‐I Yang. The network helps show where Cheng‐I Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Cheng‐I Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cheng‐I Yang Line = papers co-authored together Cheng‐I Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200472
2 201739
3 201724
4 200823
5 201722
6 201620
7 201019
8 201016
9 202416
10 201613
11 201812
12 201611
13 20189
14 20214
15 20244
16 20252
17
[Sleep hygiene for female nurses].
20052
18 20171
19 20231
20 20241

About Cheng‐I Yang

Cheng‐I Yang is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Research and Theory, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Infectious Diseases, having authored 25 papers that have together received 312 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing education and management (6 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (2 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (2 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (2 papers), Infection Control in Healthcare (2 papers) and Workplace Violence and Bullying (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (70 citations), Leadership and Management (14 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (9 citations), Clinical Psychology (76 citations) and Gender Studies (26 citations). Cheng‐I Yang has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Hsing‐Yi Yu, Shu‐Ling Chen, Meei‐Ling Gau, Wendy Hu, Fu‐Jin Shih, Shu‐Yuan Chao, Yen‐Fan Chin, Wen‐Chii Tzeng, Jiunn‐Horng Lou and Nian‐Sheng Tzeng. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, Journal of Clinical Nursing, BMC Nursing, American Journal of Infection Control and Journal of Nursing Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact