Cheng Ling

888 citations
35 papers · 655 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

    • Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 8
    • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 19
    • Machine Learning in Bioinformatics 4
    • Insect Resistance and Genetics 3

Cheng Ling

33 papers receiving 643 citations

Peers

Cheng Ling
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Ecological Modeling 54
  • Insect Science 97
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 145
  • Genetics 196
  • Paleontology 37
Replace Francisco Pina‐Martins with:
Francisco Pina‐Martins Portugal
Juan Cristobal Vera United States
Luis Javier Chueca Spain
Aslak Kappel Hansen Denmark
Christopher Jon Battey United States
Gary C. Longo United States
Elaine Françoso Brazil
Mahesh Panchal United Kingdom
Alice Maria Giani United States
C. Alex Buerkle United States
Cheng Ling relative to Francisco Pina‐Martins Portugal Francisco Pina‐Martins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Francisco Pina‐Martins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cheng Ling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cheng Ling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheng Ling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheng Ling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cheng Ling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheng Ling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheng Ling. The network helps show where Cheng Ling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cheng Ling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cheng Ling Line = papers co-authored together Cheng Ling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018335
2 201237
3 201937
4 201533
5 201627
6 201526
7 202024
8 201024
9 201115
10 202010
11 20139
12 20158
13 20198
14 20178
15 20217
16 20166
17 20246
18 20176
19 20204
20 20173

About Cheng Ling

Cheng Ling is a scholar working on Insect Science, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Plant Science and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 35 papers that have together received 655 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (19 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (8 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (8 papers), Algorithms and Data Compression (6 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (5 papers), Machine Learning in Bioinformatics (4 papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (3 papers) and Insect Resistance and Genetics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (54 citations), Insect Science (97 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (145 citations), Genetics (196 citations) and Paleontology (37 citations). Cheng Ling has collaborated with scholars based in China, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Arong Luo, Simon Y. W. Ho, Chao‐Dong Zhu, Khaled Benkrid, Yongfu Qiu, Meng Yang, Guoguang Zhao, Jingyang Gao, Donghong Sun and Weifeng Shi. Their work appears in journals such as Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Amino Acids, Current Microbiology, PLoS ONE and Euphytica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact