Chen Cheng

1.7k citations
97 papers · 1.4k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Chen Cheng

92 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Chen Cheng
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 604
  • Biophysics 93
  • Biomedical Engineering 548
  • Computational Mechanics 223
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 9
Replace Huilin Jiang with:
Huilin Jiang China
Jianzhong Zhang China
Faramarz Farahi United States
Dapeng Wang China
Yasuhiro Takaya Japan
Sina Shahbazmohamadi United States
Song Hu China
José Ángel García García Spain
Yiting Yu China
Chen Cheng relative to Huilin Jiang China Huilin Jiang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.8×
Huilin Jiang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chen Cheng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chen Cheng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chen Cheng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chen Cheng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chen Cheng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chen Cheng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chen Cheng. The network helps show where Chen Cheng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chen Cheng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chen Cheng Line = papers co-authored together Chen Cheng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 97 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201771
2 201860
3 201759
4 201854
5 201451
6 202247
7 202240
8 202239
9 202238
10 201638
11 201738
12 201437
13 202235
14 201835
15 201535
16 202133
17 201932
18 201630
19 202029
20 201828

About Chen Cheng

Chen Cheng is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Biophysics, Computational Mechanics and Media Technology, having authored 97 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (24 papers), Laser Material Processing Techniques (13 papers), Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies (10 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (9 papers), Solid State Laser Technologies (9 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (9 papers), Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (8 papers) and Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (604 citations), Biophysics (93 citations), Biomedical Engineering (548 citations), Computational Mechanics (223 citations) and Acoustics and Ultrasonics (9 citations). Chen Cheng has collaborated with scholars based in China, Spain and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Feng Chen, Javier R. Vázquez de Aldana, Ziqi Li, Yang Tan, Ningning Dong, Jun Wang, Guangsuo Yu, Qing He, Qinghua Guo and Abdul Raheem. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Express, Optics Letters, Optical Materials Express, Applied Optics and Optical Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact