Check Jh

858 citations
89 papers · 471 · h-index 12

Impact in

    • Ovarian function and disorders
    • Endometriosis Research and Treatment
    • Reproductive Health and Technologies
    • Sperm and Testicular Function
    • Gynecological conditions and treatments

Papers in

Check Jh

81 papers receiving 436 citations

Peers

Check Jh
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Reproductive Medicine 310
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 92
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 241
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 121
  • Immunology 106
Replace J H Check with:
J H Check United States
George K. Petsas Greece
E.M. Casañ Spain
Salvadora Cı́vico Spain
Mayumi Toya Japan
Fabio Scarpellini Italy
Samuel A. Pauli United States
Carmela Albert Spain
M.A. Okon United Kingdom
Ryszard J. Chetkowski United States
Check Jh relative to J H Check United States J H Check's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
J H Check · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Check Jh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Check Jh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Check Jh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Check Jh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Check Jh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Check Jh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Check Jh. The network helps show where Check Jh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Check Jh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Check Jh Line = papers co-authored together Check Jh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Effect of antagonists vs agonists on in vitro fertilization outcome.
200421
2
Effect of corporal fibroids on outcome following embryo transfer in donor-oocyte recipients.
200420
3
Marked improvement of headaches and vasomotor symptoms with sympathomimetic amines in a woman with sympathetic hyperalgesia-edema syndrome.
201120
4
Evaluation of the effect of endometriosis on oocyte quality and endometrial environment by comparison of donor and recipient outcomes following embryo transfer in a shared oocyte program.
200619
5
Progesterone therapy to decrease first-trimester spontaneous abortions in previous aborters.
198718
6
Pelvic sonography to help determine the appropriate therapy for luteal phase defects.
198417
7
Pregnancy despite imminent ovarian failure and extremely high endogenous gonadotropins and therapeutic strategies: case report and review.
200415
8
Progesterone therapy versus follicle maturing drugs--possible opposite effects on embryo implantation.
200215
9
Prenatal treatment of thyrotoxicosis to prevent intrauterine growth retardation.
198214
10 202013
11
New approaches to the diagnosis and therapy of the luteinized unruptured follicle syndrome.
198613
12
Ovarian hyperstimulation can reduce uterine receptivity. A case report.
200012
13
Effect of fibroids on cumulative probability of pregnancy in women taking follicle maturing drugs without assisted reproductive technology.
200111
14 202010
15
Live birth after posthumous testicular sperm aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection with cryopreserved sperm: case report.
200210
16
The efficacy of progesterone in achieving successful pregnancy: II. In women with pure luteal phase defects.
198710
17
The association of minimal and mild endometriosis without adhesions and infertility with therapeutic strategies.
200310
18
The majority of males with subnormal hypoosmotic test scores have normal vitality.
201210
19
Ectopic pregnancy is not more likely following fresh vs frozen embryo transfer.
20059
20
Younger women with diminished oocyte reserve are not more prone to meiosis errors leading to spontaneous abortion than their age peers with normal oocyte reserve.
20138

About Check Jh

Check Jh is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 89 papers that have together received 471 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (59 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (42 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (35 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (15 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (11 papers), Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (6 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (5 papers) and Reproductive System and Pregnancy (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (310 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (92 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (241 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (121 citations) and Immunology (106 citations). Check Jh has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Rachael Cohen, Diane Check, C. Dietterich, A. Bollendorf, Colin Wilson, Chien‐Hsing Wu, Donald L. Kramer, B. J. Hopper, BB Goldberg and Iraj Rezvani. Their work appears in journals such as PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact