Chase H. Smith

534 citations
35 papers · 356 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Chase H. Smith

33 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers

Chase H. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 155
  • Ecology 271
  • Insect Science 64
  • Ecological Modeling 20
  • Genetics 67
Replace Curt L. Elderkin with:
Curt L. Elderkin United States
Bella Japoshvili Georgia
W. R. T. Darwall United Kingdom
Do Van Tu Vietnam
André Gomes‐dos‐Santos Portugal
Matthew Neilson United States
Amanda E. Haponski United States
Abigail I. Pastore United States
Charlotte Veyssière France
Alexandra Brown United States
Chase H. Smith relative to Curt L. Elderkin United States Curt L. Elderkin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.7×
Curt L. Elderkin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chase H. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chase H. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chase H. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chase H. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chase H. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chase H. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chase H. Smith. The network helps show where Chase H. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chase H. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chase H. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Chase H. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201859
2 201936
3 201734
4 201833
5 202022
6 202122
7 202314
8 202214
9 202313
10 202212
11 202311
12 202310
13 202010
14 202110
15 20237
16 20227
17 20206
18 20206
19 20234
20 20204

About Chase H. Smith

Chase H. Smith is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Molecular Biology, Insect Science and Genetics, having authored 35 papers that have together received 356 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (28 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (14 papers), Mollusks and Parasites Studies (8 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (4 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (3 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (3 papers), Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies (2 papers) and Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (155 citations), Ecology (271 citations), Insect Science (64 citations), Ecological Modeling (20 citations) and Genetics (67 citations). Chase H. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Nathan A. Johnson, Charles R. Randklev, John M. Pfeiffer, Kentaro Inoue, Robert D. Doyle, James D. Austin, James D. Williams, Michael M. Gangloff, Hajar Fatorachian and Brendan J. Pinto. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Heredity, Diversity and Distributions, Ecology and Evolution, Scientific Reports and Conservation Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact