Charles S. Wright

495 citations
10 papers · 309 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

    • Gene Regulatory Network Analysis 3
    • Retinal Development and Disorders 1
    • Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms 3

Charles S. Wright

9 papers receiving 304 citations

Peers

Charles S. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Aging 101
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 89
  • Biophysics 22
  • Genetics 86
  • Structural Biology 4
Replace Takuma Sugi with:
Takuma Sugi Japan
Kyung Suk Lee South Korea
Avelino Javer United Kingdom
Sundar Ram Naganathan United Kingdom
Adam Kłosin Germany
Rana Amini Germany
Travis Walton United States
Titas Sengupta United States
Tosif Ahamed Netherlands
Alice Démarez France
Charles S. Wright relative to Takuma Sugi Japan Takuma Sugi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Takuma Sugi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charles S. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles S. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles S. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles S. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles S. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles S. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles S. Wright. The network helps show where Charles S. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Charles S. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charles S. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Charles S. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2014158
2 201365
3 201329
4 201323
5 200814
6 202311
7 20245
8 20243
9 20241
10 20250

About Charles S. Wright

Charles S. Wright is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Aging, Cell Biology, Genetics and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 10 papers that have together received 309 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (3 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (3 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (2 papers), Molecular Communication and Nanonetworks (2 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (2 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (1 paper), Retinal Development and Disorders (1 paper) and Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (101 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (89 citations), Biophysics (22 citations), Genetics (86 citations) and Structural Biology (4 citations). Charles S. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Stanislav Burov, Stanislav Nagy, David Biron, Srividya Iyer‐Biswas, Yihan Lin, Aaron R. Dinner, Sean Crosson, Gavin E. Crooks, Jonathan T. Henry and Norbert F. Scherer. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. E, BMC Neuroscience, Journal of Microscopy, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and SLEEP.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact