Charles G. Wright

157 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

Charles G. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Sensory Systems 1.3k
  • Otorhinolaryngology 724
  • Neurology 593
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 765
  • Chemical Health and Safety 19
Replace Samuel S. Spicer with:
Samuel S. Spicer United States
Makoto Igarashi United States
Lisa L. Cunningham United States
Jing Zou Finland
Denise Yan United States
Bradley A. Schulte United States
Qing Yin Zheng United States
Lawrence C. Erway United States
Patrick J. Willems Belgium
Joseph E. Hawkins United States
Charles G. Wright relative to Samuel S. Spicer United States Samuel S. Spicer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Samuel S. Spicer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charles G. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles G. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles G. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles G. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles G. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles G. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles G. Wright. The network helps show where Charles G. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Charles G. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charles G. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Charles G. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 162 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001274
2 2007179
3 1985161
4 2006144
5 198297
6 199495
7 197481
8 200969
9 198361
10 201060
11 201160
12 198160
13 198459
14 197259
15 198656
16 198551
17 200250
18 197348
19 200845
20 198445

About Charles G. Wright

Charles G. Wright is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Otorhinolaryngology, Genetics and Neurology, having authored 162 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (41 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (30 papers), Insects and Parasite Interactions (27 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (24 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (21 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (15 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (13 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (1.3k citations), Otorhinolaryngology (724 citations), Neurology (593 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (765 citations) and Chemical Health and Safety (19 citations). Charles G. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Peter S. Roland, William L. Meyerhoff, Steven D. Schaefer, Karen S. Pawlowski, R. B. Leidy, Kumar N. Alagramam, Brandon Isaacson, Richard P. Woychik, Robert E. Preston and Crystal L. Murcia. Their work appears in journals such as Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, Journal of Economic Entomology, Acta Oto-Laryngologica, The Laryngoscope and Hearing Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact