Charles Fenimore

3.3k citations
41 papers · 345 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Charles Fenimore

38 papers receiving 333 citations

Peers

Charles Fenimore
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Media Technology 42
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 83
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 82
  • Biophysics 16
  • Signal Processing 30
Replace Enqing Dong with:
Enqing Dong China
Michel Bister Belgium
Pei Dong China
Jurrien Bijhold Netherlands
W. A. Barrett United States
Jie Tian China
Yuan‐Hsiang Chang United States
Sanjiv S. Samant United States
Wenqing Sun China
Nicolas Normand France
Charles Fenimore relative to Enqing Dong China Enqing Dong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Enqing Dong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charles Fenimore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Fenimore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Fenimore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Fenimore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Fenimore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Fenimore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Fenimore. The network helps show where Charles Fenimore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Charles Fenimore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charles Fenimore Line = papers co-authored together Charles Fenimore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199141
2 201337
3 200933
4 200928
5 201522
6 200021
7 198713
8 201013
9 199613
10 199813
11 200511
12 200610
13 20049
14 20118
15 20058
16 20077
17 20066
18
Development of a Motion Imagery Quality Metric
20066
19 20076
20 20076

About Charles Fenimore

Charles Fenimore is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Media Technology, Aerospace Engineering and Materials Chemistry, having authored 41 papers that have together received 345 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (7 papers), Advanced Image Fusion Techniques (7 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (5 papers), Power Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation (5 papers), High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena (5 papers), Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics (4 papers) and Image and Signal Denoising Methods (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Media Technology (42 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (83 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (82 citations), Biophysics (16 citations) and Signal Processing (30 citations). Charles Fenimore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Egypt and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas Petrick, Michael F. McNitt‐Gray, Martin Misakian, John M. Libert, Andrew J. Buckler, Binsheng Zhao, Lawrence H. Schwartz, David M. Cannon, Stephen Wolf and John W. Roberts. Their work appears in journals such as Translational Oncology, Academic Radiology, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery and Journal of Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact