Charles E. Day

51 papers receiving 562 citations

Peers

Charles E. Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Cancer Research 120
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 121
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 11
  • Biochemistry 47
  • Biochemistry 37
Replace C. Lutton with:
C. Lutton France
William L. Holmes United States
Ronald F. Chanderbhan United States
N. IKEKAWA Japan
André Crastes de Paulet France
John G. Heider United States
E Tria Italy
Prudent Padieu France
C. J. W. Brooks United Kingdom
John M. Dietschy United States
Charles E. Day relative to C. Lutton France C. Lutton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
C. Lutton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charles E. Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles E. Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles E. Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles E. Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles E. Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles E. Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles E. Day. The network helps show where Charles E. Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Charles E. Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charles E. Day Line = papers co-authored together Charles E. Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1977120
2 200189
3 197662
4 197352
5 198345
6 196832
7 201124
8 197617
9 196917
10 197614
11 197513
12 197511
13 197411
14 197011
15 201510
16 197910
17 197410
18
Hypocholesterolemic activity of beta-sitosterol in cholesterol fed sea quail.
199110
19 19699
20 19748

About Charles E. Day

Charles E. Day is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Biochemistry, Surgery and Molecular Biology, having authored 56 papers that have together received 668 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism (8 papers), Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (7 papers), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (6 papers), Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (6 papers), Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (6 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (3 papers), Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (3 papers) and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (120 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (121 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (11 citations), Biochemistry (47 citations) and Biochemistry (37 citations). Charles E. Day has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Robert S. Levy, Paul E. Schurr, Ronald B. Gammill, Carl Westmoreland, Alessandro Casartelli, Esperanza Herreros, Dana T. Minnick, ELISABETH L. GEORGE, John Richard Schultz and Daniel Lednicer. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Today, Advances in experimental medicine and biology, Atherosclerosis, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Journal of Theoretical Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact