Charlene Thomas

17.6k citations
99 papers · 997 · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Charlene Thomas

86 papers receiving 984 citations

Peers

Charlene Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 84
  • Oncology 243
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 266
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 189
  • Genetics 141
Replace Nora Pashayan with:
Nora Pashayan United Kingdom
Michelle Moghadassi United States
Samuel Swisher‐McClure United States
R.P. Symonds United Kingdom
Manuel Rodrigues France
Rebecca Landy United Kingdom
Qianqian Zhao China
Emma Hudson United Kingdom
M I Resnick United States
Brittany A. Davidson United States
Charlene Thomas relative to Nora Pashayan United Kingdom Nora Pashayan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Nora Pashayan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charlene Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charlene Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charlene Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charlene Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charlene Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charlene Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charlene Thomas. The network helps show where Charlene Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Charlene Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charlene Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Charlene Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 99 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202092
2 202155
3 202440
4 202338
5 202038
6 202135
7 202134
8 202033
9 202132
10 202031
11 201728
12 201827
13 199626
14 202125
15 202122
16 202122
17 202322
18 202121
19 202221
20 202020

About Charlene Thomas

Charlene Thomas is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Oncology, Genetics and Molecular Biology, having authored 99 papers that have together received 997 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (29 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (24 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (15 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (7 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (4 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (4 papers) and COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (84 citations), Oncology (243 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (266 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (189 citations) and Genetics (141 citations). Charlene Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Paul J. Christos, Scott T. Tagawa, Melissa K. Frey, Kevin Holcomb, Eloise Chapman‐Davis, David M. Nanus, Joseph R. Osborne, Neil H. Bander, Ana M. Molina and Muhammad Junaid Niaz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Gynecologic Oncology, Annals of Oncology, The Prostate and American Journal of Roentgenology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact