Chakra Chaemfa

1.6k citations
21 papers · 1.4k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Chakra Chaemfa

21 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Chakra Chaemfa
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 1.2k
  • Environmental Chemistry 402
  • Pollution 374
  • Atmospheric Science 497
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 14
Replace T. Oliveira with:
T. Oliveira Portugal
Xiaoyan Sun China
Richard Grace United States
Liping Jiao China
Roman Prokeš Czechia
Arata Harada Japan
Luhua You Singapore
Nicola Iacovella Italy
Ky Su Canada
Yeru Huang China
Chakra Chaemfa relative to T. Oliveira Portugal T. Oliveira's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.2×
T. Oliveira · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chakra Chaemfa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chakra Chaemfa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chakra Chaemfa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chakra Chaemfa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chakra Chaemfa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chakra Chaemfa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chakra Chaemfa. The network helps show where Chakra Chaemfa may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chakra Chaemfa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chakra Chaemfa Line = papers co-authored together Chakra Chaemfa links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007303
2 2013159
3 2008103
4 2014103
5 201483
6 200679
7 201378
8 201370
9 200962
10 201452
11 200951
12 201549
13 201442
14 201041
15 200931
16 201428
17 201421
18 200712
19 201412
20 201410

About Chakra Chaemfa

Chakra Chaemfa is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Atmospheric Science, Pollution, Environmental Chemistry and Automotive Engineering, having authored 21 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (19 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (13 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (12 papers), Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research (3 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (3 papers), Microplastics and Plastic Pollution (2 papers), Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (2 papers) and Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (1.2k citations), Environmental Chemistry (402 citations), Pollution (374 citations), Atmospheric Science (497 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (14 citations). Chakra Chaemfa has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kevin C. Jones, Jonathan L. Barber, Gan Zhang, Jun Li, Sandra Huber, Urs Berger, Annika Jahnke, Christian Temme, Tom Harner and Chunling Luo. Their work appears in journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, Atmospheric Pollution Research, Atmospheric Research, Environmental Pollution and Chemosphere.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact