Chad Gonnerman

24 papers receiving 403 citations

Peers

Chad Gonnerman
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Information Systems and Management 110
  • History and Philosophy of Science 65
  • Philosophy 143
  • General Decision Sciences 14
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 137
Replace Jonas Olson with:
Jonas Olson Sweden
Gerhard Mınnameıer Germany
Donald C. Hubin United States
Andrew Sneddon Canada
Nigel Pleasants United Kingdom
Rick Rylance United Kingdom
Frederick Ferré United States
Christoph Lumer Italy
Marion Godman United Kingdom
Thomas M. Alexander United States
Chad Gonnerman relative to Jonas Olson Sweden Jonas Olson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Jonas Olson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chad Gonnerman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chad Gonnerman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chad Gonnerman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chad Gonnerman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chad Gonnerman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chad Gonnerman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chad Gonnerman. The network helps show where Chad Gonnerman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Chad Gonnerman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chad Gonnerman Line = papers co-authored together Chad Gonnerman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010123
2 2015102
3 201629
4 201226
5 201724
6 201618
7 202117
8 201916
9 201611
10 20129
11 20188
12 20166
13 20105
14 20214
15
Restrictionism and Reflection
20134
16 20204
17 20173
18
Knowledge, certainty, and skepticism: A cross-cultural study
20182
19 20222
20 20181

About Chad Gonnerman

Chad Gonnerman is a scholar working on Philosophy, Information Systems and Management, History and Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 26 papers that have together received 418 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (9 papers), Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration (7 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (6 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers), Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (3 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (3 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (110 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (65 citations), Philosophy (143 citations), General Decision Sciences (14 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (137 citations). Chad Gonnerman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Michael O’Rourke, Stephen Crowley, Jonathan M. Weinberg, Joshua Alexander, Cameron Buckner, Daniel Steel, Bethany K. Laursen, Brian Robinson, Andrew M. Parker and Klaus Keller. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Philosophical Psychology, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, The Monist and Metascience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact