Chad Cole

2.4k citations
85 papers · 1.7k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

    • T-cell and B-cell Immunology 9
    • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses 8
    • Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 8

Chad Cole

83 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Chad Cole
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 135
  • Neurology 291
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 286
  • Nephrology 82
  • Surgery 410
Replace Ai Lyn Tan with:
Ai Lyn Tan United Kingdom
Tony Goldschlager Australia
Mauro Montanari Italy
John E. OʼToole United States
Akira Murasawa Japan
Faiz U. Ahmad United States
Béatrice Bouvard France
Reza Yassari United States
Tomohiro Handa Japan
Gabriela Hernández‐Molina Mexico
Chad Cole relative to Ai Lyn Tan United Kingdom Ai Lyn Tan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12.3×
Ai Lyn Tan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chad Cole

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chad Cole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chad Cole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chad Cole more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chad Cole

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chad Cole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chad Cole. The network helps show where Chad Cole may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chad Cole, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chad Cole Line = papers co-authored together Chad Cole links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 85 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009189
2 200481
3 200780
4 202073
5 200864
6 200460
7 200753
8 200553
9 200751
10 200550
11 202040
12 200534
13 202134
14 201932
15 202131
16 201829
17 200526
18 201425
19 202225
20 202125

About Chad Cole

Chad Cole is a scholar working on Immunology, Surgery, Neurology, Nephrology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 85 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (12 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (9 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (9 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (8 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (8 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (6 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (6 papers) and Diabetes and associated disorders (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (135 citations), Neurology (291 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (286 citations), Nephrology (82 citations) and Surgery (410 citations). Chad Cole has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Meic H. Schmidt, James K. Liu, William T. Couldwell, Andrew T. Dailey, Todd D. McCall, René Lafrenière, A. Z. Barabas, Christian A. Bowers, Oren N. Gottfried and Fawaz Al‐Mufti. Their work appears in journals such as World Neurosurgery, Neurosurgical FOCUS, International Journal of Experimental Pathology, Journal of neurosurgery and Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact