C.H. Pitt

599 citations
33 papers · 488 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

    • Electrical Contact Performance and Analysis 3
    • Advanced materials and composites 3
    • Metal Alloys Wear and Properties 6
    • Microstructure and mechanical properties 4
    • Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition 3

C.H. Pitt

33 papers receiving 450 citations

Peers

C.H. Pitt
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Ecological Modeling 45
  • Metals and Alloys 24
  • Mechanical Engineering 218
  • Mechanics of Materials 118
  • Materials Chemistry 218
Replace E. E. Graham with:
E. E. Graham United States
Jürgen Pötschke Germany
Thi D. Ta Australia
W. E. Boggs
Patrik Hollman Sweden
U. Sander Germany
Zhigang Jia China
Zhiqian Sun China
R. C. Little United States
Kaiming Zhang China
C.H. Pitt relative to E. E. Graham United States E. E. Graham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×20×24×
E. E. Graham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C.H. Pitt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.H. Pitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.H. Pitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.H. Pitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.H. Pitt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.H. Pitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.H. Pitt. The network helps show where C.H. Pitt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside C.H. Pitt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C.H. Pitt Line = papers co-authored together C.H. Pitt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199954
2 198646
3 197937
4 196435
5 198834
6 198331
7 196731
8 197924
9 199320
10 197018
11 197917
12 198815
13 198314
14 198112
15 198711
16 19799
17 19718
18 19917
19 19766
20 19666

About C.H. Pitt

C.H. Pitt is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Mechanics of Materials, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 33 papers that have together received 488 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metal Alloys Wear and Properties (6 papers), Microstructure and mechanical properties (4 papers), Electrical Contact Performance and Analysis (3 papers), Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition (3 papers), Advanced materials and composites (3 papers), Erosion and Abrasive Machining (3 papers), Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties (3 papers) and Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (45 citations), Metals and Alloys (24 citations), Mechanical Engineering (218 citations), Mechanics of Materials (118 citations) and Materials Chemistry (218 citations). C.H. Pitt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and China. Frequent co-authors include M.E. Wadsworth, H. Ted Chang, Sarah Cianférani, U. Hofmeier, Ulrich J. Griesser, Terrell N. Andersen, Hong Yong Sohn, J.L. Brimhall, Charles R. Brinkman and R. W. Rohde. Their work appears in journals such as Metallurgical Transactions B, CORROSION, Fuel, Journal of Applied Physics and JOM.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact