Ch. Genzel

64 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Ch. Genzel
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Ecological Modeling 135
  • Ceramics and Composites 167
  • Mechanics of Materials 648
  • Mechanical Engineering 952
  • Materials Chemistry 851
Replace E.A. Stach with:
E.A. Stach United States
Tomokazu Sano Japan
M. Klaus Germany
J. M. Rigsbee United States
Guillaume Kermouche France
Takahisa Shobu Japan
Jiří Matějíček Czechia
G. Ravichandran United States
B.A. Wilcox United States
Benoît Beausir France
Ch. Genzel relative to E.A. Stach United States E.A. Stach's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
E.A. Stach · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ch. Genzel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ch. Genzel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ch. Genzel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ch. Genzel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ch. Genzel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ch. Genzel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ch. Genzel. The network helps show where Ch. Genzel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ch. Genzel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ch. Genzel Line = papers co-authored together Ch. Genzel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007183
2 2011182
3 201176
4 199470
5 200364
6 199056
7 200556
8 201656
9 200851
10 199950
11 199644
12 199744
13 200240
14 201139
15 200433
16 200931
17 199930
18 200926
19 200826
20 201225

About Ch. Genzel

Ch. Genzel is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (21 papers), Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses (14 papers), Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels (11 papers), Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques (11 papers), Advanced ceramic materials synthesis (9 papers), Microstructure and mechanical properties (6 papers), Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (5 papers) and Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (135 citations), Ceramics and Composites (167 citations), Mechanics of Materials (648 citations), Mechanical Engineering (952 citations) and Materials Chemistry (851 citations). Ch. Genzel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Brazil and France. Frequent co-authors include M. Klaus, W. Reimers, Ingwer A. Denks, Emad Maawad, H.‐G. Brokmeier, Lothar Wagner, Yuji Sano, Jens Gibmeier, H. Holzschuh and N. H. Nickel. Their work appears in journals such as Materials Science and Engineering A, Journal of Applied Crystallography, Thin Solid Films, Surface and Coatings Technology and Journal of Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact