Ch. E. Remé

400 citations
27 papers · 339 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Ch. E. Remé

24 papers receiving 301 citations

Peers

Ch. E. Remé
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Ophthalmology 163
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 22
  • Developmental Neuroscience 7
  • Aging 3
  • Molecular Biology 114
Replace Kiyoshi Akeo with:
Kiyoshi Akeo Japan
Ph. Hendrickson Switzerland
Olga Dembinska Canada
Ryan O. Parker United States
María Iribarne Argentina
Laura Jayne Taylor United Kingdom
KLAS‐OLAV SKOOG Sweden
Raymond Wee United States
Eleni Katzaki Italy
Ch. E. Remé relative to Kiyoshi Akeo Japan Kiyoshi Akeo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.5×
Kiyoshi Akeo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ch. E. Remé

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ch. E. Remé's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ch. E. Remé with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ch. E. Remé more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ch. E. Remé

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ch. E. Remé. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ch. E. Remé. The network helps show where Ch. E. Remé may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ch. E. Remé, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ch. E. Remé Line = papers co-authored together Ch. E. Remé links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198845
2
Autography in visual cells and pigment epithelium.
197741
3 199735
4 198332
5 199630
6 200530
7 198824
8 198321
9 199018
10
Lens implantation combined with trabeculectomy.
19859
11 19928
12 19877
13 19806
14 19886
15 19985
16 19754
17
Normal and pathological ultrastructure of the human iris; experimental iris suture in rabbits and monkeys.
19754
18 19853
19 19932
20 20032

About Ch. E. Remé

Ch. E. Remé is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Genetics, Molecular Biology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 27 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ocular and Laser Science Research (7 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (6 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (5 papers), Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity (4 papers), Ocular Disorders and Treatments (4 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (3 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (163 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (22 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (7 citations), Aging (3 citations) and Molecular Biology (114 citations). Ch. E. Remé has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kurt Munz, Ph. Hendrickson, Josef M. Pfeilschifter, Anna Wirz‐Justice, Farhad Hafezi, Kurt Gautschi, Graig E. Eldred, Dinu Stanescu-Segall, Hans Peter Iseli and Lars Matthias Ittner. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Eye Research, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Current Eye Research and New England Journal of Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact