CFD. Rocha
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Amphibian and Reptile Biology
Papers in
-
- Amphibian and Reptile Biology 17
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 12
- Co-authors
- Monique Van Sluys (7 shared papers)Helena Godoy Bergallo (4 shared papers)Maria Alice S. Alves (1 shared paper)Davor Vrcibradic (7 shared papers)Vanda Lúcia Ferreira (1 shared paper)Mauricio Almeida‐Gomes (4 shared papers)Waltécio de Oliveira Almeida (1 shared paper)Vanderlaine Amaral de Menezes (2 shared papers)
- Partner nations
- Brazil
In The Last Decade
CFD. Rocha
23 papers receiving 430 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Ecological Modeling 118
- Global and Planetary Change 290
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 200
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 102
- Ecology 174
Countries citing papers authored by CFD. Rocha
This map shows the geographic impact of CFD. Rocha's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by CFD. Rocha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites CFD. Rocha more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by CFD. Rocha
This network shows the impact of papers produced by CFD. Rocha. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by CFD. Rocha. The network helps show where CFD. Rocha may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside CFD. Rocha, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 122 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 35 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 30 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 27 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 23 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 22 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 19 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 12 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 11 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 7 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 7 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 6 |
About CFD. Rocha
CFD. Rocha is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 23 papers that have together received 447 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Amphibian and Reptile Biology (17 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (12 papers), Plant and animal studies (8 papers), Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation (7 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (5 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers) and Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (118 citations), Global and Planetary Change (290 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (200 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (102 citations) and Ecology (174 citations). CFD. Rocha has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Monique Van Sluys, Helena Godoy Bergallo, Maria Alice S. Alves, Davor Vrcibradic, Vanda Lúcia Ferreira, Mauricio Almeida‐Gomes, Waltécio de Oliveira Almeida, Vanderlaine Amaral de Menezes, Alexandre Vasconcellos and Eliza María Xavier Freire. Their work appears in journals such as Brazilian Journal of Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.