Celso Tello

5.1k citations
128 papers · 3.7k · h-index 36

Impact in

Papers in

Celso Tello

117 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Peers

Celso Tello
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Ophthalmology 2.5k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.1k
  • Neurology 147
  • Neurology 131
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 147
Replace Marcelo T. Nicolela with:
Marcelo T. Nicolela Canada
Gordon R. Douglas Canada
Shamira Perera Singapore
Wido M. Budde Germany
Folkert K. Horn Germany
Monisha E. Nongpiur Singapore
Clement L. Trempe United States
Mark B. Sherwood United States
Günther Grabner Austria
Alberto Diniz‐Filho United States
Celso Tello relative to Marcelo T. Nicolela Canada Marcelo T. Nicolela's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Marcelo T. Nicolela · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Celso Tello

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Celso Tello's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celso Tello with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celso Tello more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Celso Tello

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celso Tello. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celso Tello. The network helps show where Celso Tello may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Celso Tello, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Celso Tello Line = papers co-authored together Celso Tello links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 128 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986263
2 2011161
3
Measurement of ultrasound biomicroscopy images: intraobserver and interobserver reliability.
1994154
4 2011152
5 2012145
6 1994141
7 2011132
8 2010130
9 199587
10 200984
11 201584
12 200680
13 201080
14 201078
15 201173
16 199372
17 200572
18 201267
19 200966
20 200659

About Celso Tello

Celso Tello is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology, Molecular Biology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 128 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (72 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (21 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (15 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (13 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (5 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (5 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (4 papers) and Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (2.5k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.1k citations), Neurology (147 citations), Neurology (131 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (147 citations). Celso Tello has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey M. Liebmann, Robert Ritch, Christopher C. Teng, Robert Ritch, Carlos Gustavo V. De Moraes, Sung Chul Park, Tiago S. Prata, Seth D. Potash, John D. Porter and Paul D. Gamlin. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Journal of Glaucoma, Ophthalmology, British Journal of Ophthalmology and Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact