Celia E. Wills

3.7k citations
75 papers · 2.7k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Celia E. Wills

71 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Celia E. Wills
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
  • General Health Professions 982
  • Research and Theory 20
  • Family Practice 40
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 17
  • General Decision Sciences 28
Replace Mark Avis with:
Mark Avis United Kingdom
Diana Delnoij Netherlands
Mei Ling Yeh Taiwan
Cara S. Lesser United States
Ann Adams United Kingdom
Angus Forbes United Kingdom
Ruth Ludwick United States
Jo Hart United Kingdom
R. Van Harrison United States
Lisa Soleymani Lehmann United States
Celia E. Wills relative to Mark Avis United Kingdom Mark Avis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7×
Mark Avis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Celia E. Wills

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Celia E. Wills's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celia E. Wills with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celia E. Wills more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Celia E. Wills

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celia E. Wills. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celia E. Wills. The network helps show where Celia E. Wills may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Celia E. Wills, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Celia E. Wills Line = papers co-authored together Celia E. Wills links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007318
2 2013204
3 2006201
4 2013191
5 2010148
6 2017147
7 1997124
8 201282
9 200377
10 201776
11 200673
12
Clinical Research: Concepts and Principles for Advanced Practice Nurses
200373
13 200363
14 200958
15 199955
16 201554
17 201753
18 200642
19 200439
20 200727

About Celia E. Wills

Celia E. Wills is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Oncology, Applied Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 75 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (19 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (6 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (3 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (3 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (982 citations), Research and Theory (20 citations), Family Practice (40 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (17 citations) and General Decision Sciences (28 citations). Celia E. Wills has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Margaret Holmes‐Rovner, Martin Härter, Daniela Simón, Andreas Loh, Levente Kriston, Manfred Stommel, Wilhelm Niebling, Carrie A. Levin, Rainer Leonhart and Carla K. Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Patient Education and Counseling, Health Expectations, Medical Decision Making, Western Journal of Nursing Research and Research in Nursing & Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact