Celia E. Schultz

495 citations
15 papers · 100 · h-index 6

Impact in

  • Anthropology top 10%
    • Classical Antiquity Studies
    • Byzantine Studies and History
    • Medieval Literature and History

Papers in

    • Classical Antiquity Studies 9
    • Historical and Literary Studies 2
    • Historical and Religious Studies of Rome 6
    • Classical Studies and Legal History 2

Celia E. Schultz

10 papers receiving 64 citations

Peers

Celia E. Schultz
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Anthropology 67
  • Classics 19
  • Archeology 49
  • Religious studies 11
  • Philosophy 22
Replace Christoph Ulf with:
Christoph Ulf Austria
Lewis Richard Farnell
Jacqueline Klooster Netherlands
Robert Lamberton
Bruce Louden United States
Irmgard Männlein‐Robert
Joseph Skinner United Kingdom
Bill Gladhill Canada
András Németh Germany
Marietta Horster Germany
Celia E. Schultz relative to Christoph Ulf Austria Christoph Ulf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Christoph Ulf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Celia E. Schultz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Celia E. Schultz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celia E. Schultz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celia E. Schultz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Celia E. Schultz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celia E. Schultz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celia E. Schultz. The network helps show where Celia E. Schultz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Celia E. Schultz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Celia E. Schultz Line = papers co-authored together Celia E. Schultz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 200920
2 200617
3 201616
4 201416
5 20109
6 20068
7
Modern Prejudice and Ancient Praxis: Female Worship of Hercules at Rome: Female Worship of Hercules at Rome
20005
8 20125
9 20032
10 20212
11 20180
12 20210
13 20190
14 20220
15 20190

About Celia E. Schultz

Celia E. Schultz is a scholar working on Anthropology, History, Archeology, Classics and Language and Linguistics, having authored 15 papers that have together received 100 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (9 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (6 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (2 papers), Classical Studies and Legal History (2 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers), Medieval Literature and History (1 paper) and Lexicography and Language Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (67 citations), Classics (19 citations), Archeology (49 citations), Religious studies (11 citations) and Philosophy (22 citations). Celia E. Schultz has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Allen M. Ward. Their work appears in journals such as Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, Historia, The American Journal of Philology, The Journal of Roman Studies and Journal of the American Academy of Religion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact