Celia Doyle

436 citations
28 papers · 310 · h-index 9

Impact in

  • Health top 5%
    • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
    • Child Abuse and Trauma
    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Papers in

    • Child Abuse and Trauma 10
    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 2
    • Child Therapy and Development 1
    • Child Welfare and Adoption 8

Celia Doyle

23 papers receiving 238 citations

Peers

Celia Doyle
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Health 91
  • Clinical Psychology 201
  • Public Administration 37
  • Safety Research 71
  • General Health Professions 51
Replace Lisa V. Blitz with:
Lisa V. Blitz United States
Kerrie James Australia
Odd Arne Tjersland Norway
Sally V. Hunter Australia
Hugo Kamya United States
Heidi Adams Rueda United States
Corinne Wattam Germany
Edna Guttmann Israel
Martin C. Calder United Kingdom
Jennifer Lawson United States
Celia Doyle relative to Lisa V. Blitz United States Lisa V. Blitz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Lisa V. Blitz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Celia Doyle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Celia Doyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celia Doyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celia Doyle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Celia Doyle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celia Doyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celia Doyle. The network helps show where Celia Doyle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Celia Doyle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Celia Doyle Line = papers co-authored together Celia Doyle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199675
2 199747
3 200140
4 201224
5 199017
6 199416
7 199414
8 199611
9 20039
10 19978
11 20107
12
Working with abused children : from theory to practice
20066
13 20146
14 20125
15 19974
16 20094
17 19974
18 19964
19 19972
20
Working with abused children : focus on the child
20121

About Celia Doyle

Celia Doyle is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science, Health and Public Administration, having authored 28 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (10 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (8 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (2 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (2 papers), Sex work and related issues (1 paper) and Child Therapy and Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (91 citations), Clinical Psychology (201 citations), Public Administration (37 citations), Safety Research (71 citations) and General Health Professions (51 citations). Celia Doyle has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Susan Kennedy and Darla R. Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Child Abuse Review, Children & Society, Child Abuse & Neglect, The Laryngoscope and The British Journal of Social Work.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact