Cédric Diot

419 citations
11 papers · 238 · h-index 8

Impact in

  • Aging top 10%
    • Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
    • RNA Research and Splicing
    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
    • RNA modifications and cancer

Papers in

Cédric Diot

11 papers receiving 237 citations

Peers

Cédric Diot
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Aging 25
  • Molecular Biology 168
  • Cancer Research 28
  • Epidemiology 57
  • Immunology 37
Replace Zach Klapholz O’Brown with:
Zach Klapholz O’Brown United States
Alexandra M Fenton United States
Yijian Yan China
Chintan Joshi United States
Joseph F. Welk United States
R Sorrentino Italy
Clark Fritsch United States
Tamaki Izume Japan
Moritz Horn Germany
Nnamdi Ihuegbu United States
Cédric Diot relative to Zach Klapholz O’Brown United States Zach Klapholz O’Brown's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Zach Klapholz O’Brown · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cédric Diot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cédric Diot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cédric Diot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cédric Diot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cédric Diot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cédric Diot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cédric Diot. The network helps show where Cédric Diot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cédric Diot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cédric Diot Line = papers co-authored together Cédric Diot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 201772
2 201344
3 201634
4 202118
5 202217
6 201015
7 202111
8 202310
9 20226
10 20176
11 20185

About Cédric Diot

Cédric Diot is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases, Aging, Animal Science and Zoology and Epidemiology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 238 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (3 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (3 papers), Respiratory viral infections research (2 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (2 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (2 papers), Animal Virus Infections Studies (2 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (1 paper) and Circadian rhythm and melatonin (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (25 citations), Molecular Biology (168 citations), Cancer Research (28 citations), Epidemiology (57 citations) and Immunology (37 citations). Cédric Diot has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Nadia Naffakh, Sandie Munier, Éric Lécuyer, Thomas Rolland, Xiaofeng Wang, Yves Jacob, Mathieu Blanchette, Louis Philip Benoit Bouvrette, Julie Bergalet and Neal Cody. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Methods, Early Human Development and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact