Cécile Devaud

969 citations
44 papers · 794 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Cécile Devaud

43 papers receiving 782 citations

Peers

Cécile Devaud
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 576
  • Computational Mechanics 648
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 278
  • Environmental Engineering 178
  • Aerospace Engineering 131
Replace Khawar J. Syed with:
Khawar J. Syed Switzerland
Francesca di Mare Germany
Steffen Terhaar Germany
Y. Sommerer France
Wolfgang Weisenstein Switzerland
Hany A. Moneib Egypt
Kjell Erik Rian Norway
Marco Ferrarotti Belgium
Masahiko Mizomoto Japan
A. Y. Klimenko Australia
Cécile Devaud relative to Khawar J. Syed Switzerland Khawar J. Syed's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Khawar J. Syed · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cécile Devaud

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cécile Devaud's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cécile Devaud with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cécile Devaud more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cécile Devaud

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cécile Devaud. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cécile Devaud. The network helps show where Cécile Devaud may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Cécile Devaud, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cécile Devaud Line = papers co-authored together Cécile Devaud links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201174
2 200362
3 200840
4 200440
5 201835
6 201534
7 201432
8 201331
9 201529
10 201729
11 201526
12 201425
13 201323
14 201120
15 201720
16 201620
17 201419
18 201916
19 200815
20 201614

About Cécile Devaud

Cécile Devaud is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Environmental Engineering and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 44 papers that have together received 794 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Combustion and flame dynamics (35 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (34 papers), Fire dynamics and safety research (15 papers), Wind and Air Flow Studies (14 papers), Combustion and Detonation Processes (5 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (5 papers), Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies (3 papers) and Radiative Heat Transfer Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (576 citations), Computational Mechanics (648 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (278 citations), Environmental Engineering (178 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (131 citations). Cécile Devaud has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Belgium and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey W. Labahn, R.W. Bilger, Amir Khajepour, William Chung, Yangtao Li, Giulio Borghesi, Epaminondas Mastorakos, M. Mahdi Salehi, W. Kendal Bushe and Ali Ashrafizadeh. Their work appears in journals such as Combustion Theory and Modelling, Combustion and Flame, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids and Applied Energy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact