Cecelia Lynch

986 citations
35 papers · 400 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Cecelia Lynch

30 papers receiving 333 citations

Peers

Cecelia Lynch
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Development 53
  • Political Science and International Relations 192
  • Sociology and Political Science 289
  • Public Administration 14
  • Religious studies 18
Replace Geeta Chowdhry with:
Geeta Chowdhry United States
Frédéric Volpi United Kingdom
William Gumede South Africa
Leonardo A. Villalón United States
Lahouari Addi France
Scott M. Thomas United Kingdom
Orville Schell United States
Jan Knippers Black United States
Anindya Sekhar Purakayastha India
John Chalcraft United Kingdom
Cecelia Lynch relative to Geeta Chowdhry United States Geeta Chowdhry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Geeta Chowdhry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cecelia Lynch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cecelia Lynch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cecelia Lynch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cecelia Lynch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cecelia Lynch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cecelia Lynch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cecelia Lynch. The network helps show where Cecelia Lynch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Cecelia Lynch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cecelia Lynch Line = papers co-authored together Cecelia Lynch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201455
2 201354
3 200935
4 200832
5 199832
6 201624
7
Religious Humanitarianism and the Global Politics of Secularism
201016
8 200016
9 199415
10 200014
11 201412
12
Law and Moral Action in World Politics
19999
13 20139
14 20198
15 20208
16 19948
17 20117
18 19997
19 20207
20 20066

About Cecelia Lynch

Cecelia Lynch is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, History, Development and Philosophy, having authored 35 papers that have together received 400 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Society, and Development (14 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (10 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (8 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (4 papers), International Development and Aid (3 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (3 papers), Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory (2 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (53 citations), Political Science and International Relations (192 citations), Sociology and Political Science (289 citations), Public Administration (14 citations) and Religious studies (18 citations). Cecelia Lynch has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Audie Klotz and Michael Loriaux. Their work appears in journals such as Millennium Journal of International Studies, Ethics & International Affairs, International Studies Review, Alternatives Global Local Political and Global Governance A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact