Cayla Key

403 citations
9 papers · 304 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Journals
Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (2 papers)Edinburgh Research Explorer (1 paper)Designing Interactive Systems Conference (1 paper)

In The Last Decade

Cayla Key

8 papers receiving 297 citations

Peers

Cayla Key
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Human-Computer Interaction 259
  • Museology 16
  • Demography 54
  • Computer Science Applications 22
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 24
Replace Iohanna Nicenboim with:
Iohanna Nicenboim Netherlands
Heidi Biggs United States
Connie Golsteijn United Kingdom
Tobie Kerridge United Kingdom
Aloha Hufana Ambe Australia
Leah Maestri Canada
Pedro Reynolds-Cuéllar United States
Shad Gross United States
Arne Berger Germany
Saba Kawas United States
Cayla Key relative to Iohanna Nicenboim Netherlands Iohanna Nicenboim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Iohanna Nicenboim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cayla Key

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cayla Key's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cayla Key with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cayla Key more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cayla Key

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cayla Key. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cayla Key. The network helps show where Cayla Key may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Cayla Key, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cayla Key Line = papers co-authored together Cayla Key links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown

About Cayla Key

Cayla Key is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Sociology and Political Science, Management of Technology and Innovation, Demography and Social Psychology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (9 papers), Persona Design and Applications (4 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (3 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (2 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (2 papers), Information Systems Theories and Implementation (2 papers), Digital Games and Media (1 paper) and AI in Service Interactions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (259 citations), Museology (16 citations), Demography (54 citations), Computer Science Applications (22 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (24 citations). Cayla Key has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Audrey Desjardins, Heidi Biggs, Nick Taylor, Fiona Browne, Jon Rogers, Holly Robbins, Yolande Strengers, Iohanna Nicenboim, Elisa Giaccardi and Maria Luce Lupetti. Their work appears in journals such as Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee), Edinburgh Research Explorer and Designing Interactive Systems Conference.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact