Catia C. Proenca

1.2k citations
18 papers · 935 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Catia C. Proenca

17 papers receiving 918 citations

Peers

Catia C. Proenca
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Developmental Neuroscience 155
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 326
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 214
  • Clinical Psychology 191
  • Sensory Systems 43
Replace Constance Smith‐Hicks with:
Constance Smith‐Hicks United States
Myriam Srour Canada
Déborah Morris-Rosendahl Germany
Michaël Ogier France
W.G. Honer Canada
Mario Vukšić Croatia
Ignasi Sahún Spain
Susan C. Feldman United States
Michael Schoen Germany
Kuriko Kagitani‐Shimono Japan
Catia C. Proenca relative to Constance Smith‐Hicks United States Constance Smith‐Hicks's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Constance Smith‐Hicks · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Catia C. Proenca

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catia C. Proenca's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catia C. Proenca with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catia C. Proenca more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catia C. Proenca

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catia C. Proenca. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catia C. Proenca. The network helps show where Catia C. Proenca may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Catia C. Proenca, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Catia C. Proenca Line = papers co-authored together Catia C. Proenca links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2010258
2 2008132
3 2016115
4 201173
5 201572
6 200871
7 201652
8 201037
9 201833
10 201825
11 201325
12 201819
13 201815
14 20184
15 20172
16 20231
17 20171
18 20250

About Catia C. Proenca

Catia C. Proenca is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 18 papers that have together received 935 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Heart Failure Treatment and Management (7 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (5 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (3 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (2 papers) and Medication Adherence and Compliance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (155 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (326 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (214 citations), Clinical Psychology (191 citations) and Sensory Systems (43 citations). Catia C. Proenca has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Francis S. Lee, Sergey V. Shmelkov, Shahin Rafii, Deqiang Jing, Kevin G. Bath, Minseok Song, Iva Dincheva, David M. Valenzuela, Till Milde and Nicholas W. Gale. Their work appears in journals such as Drug Design Development and Therapy, Value in Health, iScience, Nature Medicine and Blood.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact