Cathy Monteith

427 citations
22 papers · 305 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Cathy Monteith

20 papers receiving 296 citations

Peers

Cathy Monteith
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 122
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 129
  • Internal Medicine 10
  • Hematology 22
  • Health Informatics 2
Replace Usama M. Fouda with:
Usama M. Fouda Egypt
Cem Turan Türkiye
Monique W. M. de Laat Netherlands
J. Kurmanavicius Switzerland
Ching-Chang Hsieh Taiwan
Aldo Khoury United States
José Enrique Sanín-Blair Colombia
Showa Aoki Japan
José Antonio García‐Mejido Spain
Paul Tyan United States
Cathy Monteith relative to Usama M. Fouda Egypt Usama M. Fouda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Usama M. Fouda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cathy Monteith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cathy Monteith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cathy Monteith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cathy Monteith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cathy Monteith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cathy Monteith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cathy Monteith. The network helps show where Cathy Monteith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cathy Monteith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cathy Monteith Line = papers co-authored together Cathy Monteith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201377
2 201932
3 201728
4 201624
5 198223
6 201622
7 201621
8 201718
9 201716
10 201915
11 201710
12 20166
13 20175
14 20182
15 20131
16 20221
17 20161
18 20131
19 20201
20 20161

About Cathy Monteith

Cathy Monteith is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Epidemiology, Surgery and Rheumatology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 305 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (5 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (3 papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (2 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (2 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (2 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (1 paper), Folate and B Vitamins Research (1 paper) and Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (122 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (129 citations), Internal Medicine (10 citations), Hematology (22 citations) and Health Informatics (2 citations). Cathy Monteith has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mary Higgins, Michael Foley, Colm O’Herlihy, Fergal D. Malone, Elizabeth Tully, Patrick Dicker, Colm R. Breatnach, Afif El‐Khuffash, Ariel Bardach and M. D. Maves. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Journal of Perinatal Medicine, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics and Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact