Catherine O’Doherty

807 citations
25 papers · 653 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Catherine O’Doherty

25 papers receiving 636 citations

Peers

Catherine O’Doherty
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 205
  • Rheumatology 123
  • Pharmacology 63
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 99
  • Immunology 36
Replace Fataneh Amidi with:
Fataneh Amidi United States
Naoko Matsui Japan
Jürgen Lautermann Germany
Yuhong Xie China
Aurélie Ledru France
Masae Furukawa Japan
G. Battistuzzi Italy
Elizabeth F. Cochary United States
Beatrice Paola Festa Switzerland
H. N. BERNSTEIN United States
Catherine O’Doherty relative to Fataneh Amidi United States Fataneh Amidi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×13.7×
Fataneh Amidi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine O’Doherty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine O’Doherty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine O’Doherty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine O’Doherty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine O’Doherty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine O’Doherty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine O’Doherty. The network helps show where Catherine O’Doherty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Catherine O’Doherty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Catherine O’Doherty Line = papers co-authored together Catherine O’Doherty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201282
2 201079
3 201350
4 201340
5 200938
6 200937
7 201235
8 200834
9 200533
10 200726
11 201424
12 201223
13 201323
14 200722
15 201320
16 201517
17 200716
18 201516
19 200710
20 20149

About Catherine O’Doherty

Catherine O’Doherty is a scholar working on Rheumatology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Biochemistry, having authored 25 papers that have together received 653 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies (11 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (11 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (4 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (1 paper), Folate and B Vitamins Research (1 paper), Sulfur Compounds in Biology (1 paper) and Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (205 citations), Rheumatology (123 citations), Pharmacology (63 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (99 citations) and Immunology (36 citations). Catherine O’Doherty has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Koen Vandenbroeck, Vijayaprakash Suppiah, Manya Therese Angley, Michael David Wiese, Sunil Mahurkar, Susanna Proudman, Michael Joseph Sorich, Michael Felix Fenech, Michael Felix Fenech and Leslie G. Cleland. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroimmunology, Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology, The Pharmacogenomics Journal, Pharmacogenomics and CPT Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact