Catherine McHugh

1.3k citations
40 papers · 766 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Catherine McHugh

35 papers receiving 730 citations

Peers

Catherine McHugh
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Clinical Psychology 388
  • Applied Psychology 37
  • Social Psychology 159
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 69
  • Biological Psychiatry 16
Replace Melissa Milanovic with:
Melissa Milanovic Canada
Fred J. Biasini United States
Kathryn M. Godfrey United States
Antônio de Pádua Serafim Brazil
David Walshe Ireland
Maria Hagl Germany
Jaye Wald Canada
Sverre Nesvåg Norway
Per-Arne Rimmö Sweden
F.K. Withaar Netherlands
Catherine McHugh relative to Melissa Milanovic Canada Melissa Milanovic's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Melissa Milanovic · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine McHugh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine McHugh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine McHugh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine McHugh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine McHugh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine McHugh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine McHugh. The network helps show where Catherine McHugh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Catherine McHugh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Catherine McHugh Line = papers co-authored together Catherine McHugh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019155
2 2019140
3 2007100
4 202094
5 202045
6 201735
7 201624
8 201720
9 201616
10 201815
11 202113
12 201813
13 201711
14 199910
15
The even-number guide and imaging ballistic injuries.
20078
16 20178
17 20208
18 20236
19 20216
20 20235

About Catherine McHugh

Catherine McHugh is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 40 papers that have together received 766 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (8 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (5 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (4 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (3 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (3 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (3 papers), Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education (2 papers) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (388 citations), Applied Psychology (37 citations), Social Psychology (159 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (69 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (16 citations). Catherine McHugh has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Matthew Large, Amy Corderoy, Ian B. Hickie, Richard A. Fuller, Christopher Ryan, Daniel F. Hermens, Sivasankaran Balaratnasingam, Jennifer Cook, John T. Rapp and Laura Keaver. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Behavior Modification, BJPsych Open, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry and Journal of Affective Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact