Catherine Key
Impact in
- Developmental Biology top 10%
- Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
- Archeology top 5%
- Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
- Paleopathology and ancient diseases
Papers in
-
- Primate Behavior and Ecology 2
-
- Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior 2
- Co-authors
- Caroline Ross (1 shared paper)Leslie C. Aiello (2 shared papers)Theya Molleson (1 shared paper)Adrienne L. Zihlman (1 shared paper)Mary Ellen Morbeck (1 shared paper)Alison Galloway (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- World Archaeology (2 papers)Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (1 paper)Folia Primatologica (1 paper)International Journal of Osteoarchaeology (1 paper)Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Catherine Key
7 papers receiving 281 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Developmental Biology 36
- Archeology 74
- Social Psychology 125
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 56
- Paleontology 27
Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Key
This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Key's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Key with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Key more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Key
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Key. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Key. The network helps show where Catherine Key may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Catherine Key, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 123 | |
| 2 | 1994 | 95 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 43 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 25 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 4 | |
| 7 | 1999 | 2 |
About Catherine Key
Catherine Key is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 7 papers that have together received 305 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primate Behavior and Ecology (2 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (2 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (1 paper), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (1 paper), Cleft Lip and Palate Research (1 paper), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (1 paper), Work-Family Balance Challenges (1 paper) and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (36 citations), Archeology (74 citations), Social Psychology (125 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (56 citations) and Paleontology (27 citations). Catherine Key has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Caroline Ross, Leslie C. Aiello, Theya Molleson, Adrienne L. Zihlman, Mary Ellen Morbeck and Alison Galloway. Their work appears in journals such as World Archaeology, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Folia Primatologica, International Journal of Osteoarchaeology and Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.