Cassandra Wright

1.8k citations
76 papers · 1.2k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Cassandra Wright

68 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Cassandra Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Applied Psychology 97
  • Clinical Psychology 230
  • Gender Studies 100
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 47
  • General Health Professions 191
Replace Tisha Wiley with:
Tisha Wiley United States
Joseph R. Merighi United States
Isaac D. Montoya United States
Gayle R. Byck United States
Eun‐Ok Im United States
Jon Agley United States
Li‐Chun Chang Taiwan
Lauren Vogel Australia
Paula Klemm United States
May Sudhinaraset United States
Cassandra Wright relative to Tisha Wiley United States Tisha Wiley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11.8×
Tisha Wiley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cassandra Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cassandra Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cassandra Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cassandra Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cassandra Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cassandra Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cassandra Wright. The network helps show where Cassandra Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cassandra Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cassandra Wright Line = papers co-authored together Cassandra Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018167
2 201795
3 202071
4 201955
5 200052
6 201845
7 202040
8 202137
9 201834
10 201634
11 201633
12 201632
13 202230
14 202230
15 202028
16 202128
17 201927
18 201622
19 201821
20 201820

About Cassandra Wright

Cassandra Wright is a scholar working on Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 76 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (21 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (8 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (6 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (5 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (5 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (4 papers), Sex work and related issues (3 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (97 citations), Clinical Psychology (230 citations), Gender Studies (100 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (47 citations) and General Health Professions (191 citations). Cassandra Wright has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Hungary and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Megan S. C. Lim, Emmanuel Kuntsche, Paul Dietze, Elise R. Carrotte, Michael Livingston, Mia Miller, Michelle Raggatt, Angela Davis, Sandra Kuntsche and Rebecca Jenkinson. Their work appears in journals such as Drug and Alcohol Review, Health Promotion Journal of Australia, International Journal of Drug Policy, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health and Sexual Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact