Carsten Cleff

749 citations
22 papers · 556 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Carsten Cleff

21 papers receiving 512 citations

Peers

Carsten Cleff
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Biophysics 242
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 334
  • Analytical Chemistry 72
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 6
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 261
Replace Mario Chemnitz with:
Mario Chemnitz Germany
Simon Lefrançois United States
Mordechai Katz United States
Willem P. Beeker Netherlands
Martin Baumgartl Germany
Jean-Louis Oudar France
Richard Hostein France
Hironobu Yoshimi Japan
Kangwen Yang China
Wenhao Xu China
Carsten Cleff relative to Mario Chemnitz Germany Mario Chemnitz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mario Chemnitz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Carsten Cleff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Carsten Cleff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carsten Cleff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carsten Cleff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Carsten Cleff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carsten Cleff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carsten Cleff. The network helps show where Carsten Cleff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Carsten Cleff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Carsten Cleff Line = papers co-authored together Carsten Cleff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017201
2 200958
3 201041
4 201636
5 201232
6 200830
7 201126
8 201326
9 201125
10 201817
11 201015
12 201914
13 200711
14 201210
15 20103
16 20173
17 20163
18 20232
19 20111
20 20091

About Carsten Cleff

Carsten Cleff is a scholar working on Biophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Analytical Chemistry, having authored 22 papers that have together received 556 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (13 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (9 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (8 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (7 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (5 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (5 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (4 papers) and Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (242 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (334 citations), Analytical Chemistry (72 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (6 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (261 citations). Carsten Cleff has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Carsten Fallnich, Petra Groß, Klaus J. Boller, Herman L. Offerhaus, Willem P. Beeker, Sven Dobner, Chris Lee, Jennifer L. Herek, W. Hänsel and Michele Giunta. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics B, Physical Review A, Optics Express, Journal of Raman Spectroscopy and Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact