Carson Ingo

879 citations
28 papers · 667 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Carson Ingo

28 papers receiving 647 citations

Peers

Carson Ingo
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Modeling and Simulation 187
  • Numerical Analysis 78
  • Rehabilitation 75
  • Computational Mathematics 7
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 225
Replace Vincenzo Sciacca with:
Vincenzo Sciacca Italy
Gregory D. Lyng United States
Rodolfo G. Gatto United States
Daniel B. Rowe United States
Stephen L. Keeling Austria
Jonathan Wong United States
Johannes Reichold Switzerland
Svein Ohm Linge Norway
Mirosław Łątka Poland
Carson Ingo relative to Vincenzo Sciacca Italy Vincenzo Sciacca's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.5×
Vincenzo Sciacca · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Carson Ingo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Carson Ingo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carson Ingo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carson Ingo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Carson Ingo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carson Ingo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carson Ingo. The network helps show where Carson Ingo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Carson Ingo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Carson Ingo Line = papers co-authored together Carson Ingo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013139
2 2013102
3 201779
4 201754
5 201547
6 201432
7 201526
8 201725
9 201820
10 201620
11 201219
12 202116
13 202015
14 201814
15 202011
16 201911
17 20219
18 20145
19 20145
20 20234

About Carson Ingo

Carson Ingo is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Modeling and Simulation, Psychiatry and Mental health, Rehabilitation and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 667 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (17 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Fractional Differential Equations Solutions (6 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (4 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (4 papers), Statistical Mechanics and Entropy (3 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (3 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (187 citations), Numerical Analysis (78 citations), Rehabilitation (75 citations), Computational Mathematics (7 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (225 citations). Carson Ingo has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include Richard L. Magin, William Triplett, Luis M. Colón-Pérez, Thomas H. Mareci, Julius P. A. Dewald, Itamar Ronen, Todd B. Parrish, ANDREW G. WEBB, Carolina Carmona and Jun Yao. Their work appears in journals such as Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Frontiers in Neurology, NMR in Biomedicine, Brain Communications and Brain Structure and Function.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact