Caroline Smith

38 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Caroline Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 58
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 147
  • Pharmacology 289
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 132
  • Rehabilitation 77
Replace Ev Innes with:
Ev Innes Australia
Tatiana de Oliveira Sato Brazil
Maaike A. Huysmans Netherlands
Marina Heiden Sweden
Eileen M. Wanke Germany
Judith E. Gold United States
Rodrigo Luiz Carregaro Brazil
Ulrika Aasa Sweden
Joseph Hurrell United States
Susan Kotowski United States
Caroline Smith relative to Ev Innes Australia Ev Innes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Ev Innes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Smith. The network helps show where Caroline Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Caroline Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Caroline Smith Line = papers co-authored together Caroline Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011135
2 200894
3 200987
4 200676
5 200972
6 201068
7 200864
8 200952
9 200150
10 200843
11 201340
12 201337
13 202036
14 200832
15 201728
16 200828
17 201723
18 200922
19 201020
20 200420

About Caroline Smith

Caroline Smith is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Social Psychology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Clinical Psychology and Surgery, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (4 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (3 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers), Occupational health in dentistry (3 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers) and Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Laboratory Technology (58 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (147 citations), Pharmacology (289 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (132 citations) and Rehabilitation (77 citations). Caroline Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Silverstein, Z. Joyce Fan, Stephen Bao, Ninica Howard, Eira Viikari‐Juntura, Peregrin Spielholz, David K. Bonauto, Naomi Anderson, Darrin Adams and Judith E. Deutsch. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Industrial Medicine, Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health, British Journal of Social Psychology, British Journal of Developmental Psychology and Journal of Safety Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact