Caroline Rawdon

591 citations
17 papers · 444 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Caroline Rawdon

17 papers receiving 440 citations

Peers

Caroline Rawdon
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 201
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 72
  • Clinical Psychology 110
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 87
  • Biological Psychiatry 8
Replace Tate F. Halverson with:
Tate F. Halverson United States
Rachael Spooner Australia
Emi Ikebuchi Japan
Renaud F. Cohen France
Montserrat Dolz Spain
Niamh Dooley Ireland
Lida‐Alkisti Xenaki Greece
Devi Treen Spain
Clélia Quilès France
Anne‐Kari Torgalsbøen Norway
Caroline Rawdon relative to Tate F. Halverson United States Tate F. Halverson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×39×
Tate F. Halverson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Rawdon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Rawdon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Rawdon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Rawdon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Rawdon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Rawdon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Rawdon. The network helps show where Caroline Rawdon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Caroline Rawdon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Caroline Rawdon Line = papers co-authored together Caroline Rawdon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2015114
2 201282
3 201266
4 201340
5 201824
6 201624
7 201222
8 201518
9 201313
10 201911
11 20237
12 20196
13 20126
14 20174
15 20223
16 20252
17 20232

About Caroline Rawdon

Caroline Rawdon is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 444 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetes Management and Research (6 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (4 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (1 paper) and Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (201 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (72 citations), Clinical Psychology (110 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (87 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (8 citations). Caroline Rawdon has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Ian Kelleher, Mary Cannon, Jennifer Murphy, Mary Clarke, Amanda Fitzgerald, Niamh Higgins, A. Murtagh, Helen Coughlan, Erik O’Hanlon and Michelle Harley. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, BMC Psychiatry, Schizophrenia Bulletin, Diabetic Medicine and Cognitive Neuropsychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact