Carleton B. Scott
Impact in
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Chemical Reaction Mechanisms
- Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry
- Chemical Synthesis and Reactions
-
- Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Papers in
-
- Coal and Coke Industries Research 2
-
- Chemical Reaction Mechanisms 3
- Synthesis and Reactivity of Sulfur-Containing Compounds 2
- Organophosphorus compounds synthesis 1
- Co-authors
- C. Gardner Swain (3 shared papers)D. B. Fischbach (1 shared paper)Ronald E. Bullock (1 shared paper)James L. Kaae (1 shared paper)James P. Smith (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Nuclear Technology (4 papers)Journal of the American Chemical Society (3 papers)JOM (2 papers)The Journal of Organic Chemistry (1 paper)Journal of Applied Physics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Carleton B. Scott
13 papers receiving 639 citations
Carleton B. Scott's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Organic Chemistry 436
- Cancer Research 108
- Pharmaceutical Science 28
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 36
- Filtration and Separation 6
Countries citing papers authored by Carleton B. Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of Carleton B. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carleton B. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carleton B. Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Carleton B. Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carleton B. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carleton B. Scott. The network helps show where Carleton B. Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Carleton B. Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Quantitative Correlation of Relative Rates. Comparison of Hydroxide Ion with Other Nucleophilic Reagents toward Alkyl Halides, Esters, Epoxides and Acyl Halides1 Hit paper breakdown → | 1953 | 560 |
| 2 | 1953 | 79 | |
| 3 | 1953 | 33 | |
| 4 | 1977 | 20 | |
| 5 | 1976 | 13 | |
| 6 | 1977 | 12 | |
| 7 | 1975 | 11 | |
| 8 | 1957 | 7 | |
| 9 | 1955 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1977 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1971 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1972 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 1 |
About Carleton B. Scott
Carleton B. Scott is a scholar working on Fuel Technology, Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 13 papers that have together received 747 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear Materials and Properties (5 papers), Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies (5 papers), Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (3 papers), Coal and Coke Industries Research (2 papers), Synthesis and Reactivity of Sulfur-Containing Compounds (2 papers), Electromagnetic wave absorption materials (1 paper), Organophosphorus compounds synthesis (1 paper) and Fiber-reinforced polymer composites (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (436 citations), Cancer Research (108 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (28 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (36 citations) and Filtration and Separation (6 citations). Carleton B. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include C. Gardner Swain, D. B. Fischbach, Ronald E. Bullock, James L. Kaae and James P. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Technology, Journal of the American Chemical Society, JOM, The Journal of Organic Chemistry and Journal of Applied Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.