Carl Eberhart

425 citations
31 papers · 298 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Carl Eberhart

25 papers receiving 188 citations

Peers

Carl Eberhart
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Geometry and Topology 185
  • Mathematical Physics 146
  • Algebra and Number Theory 42
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 120
  • Management Science and Operations Research 68
Replace D. W. Curtis with:
D. W. Curtis United States
Włodzimierz J. Charatonik Poland
William F. Lindgren United States
Ernest P. Lane United States
Sandro Levi Italy
William Weiss Canada
Paul Bankston United States
J. M. Worrell United States
Edward T. Ordman United States
R. Schori United States
Carl Eberhart relative to D. W. Curtis United States D. W. Curtis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7×
D. W. Curtis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Carl Eberhart

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Carl Eberhart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carl Eberhart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carl Eberhart more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Carl Eberhart

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carl Eberhart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carl Eberhart. The network helps show where Carl Eberhart may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Carl Eberhart, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Carl Eberhart Line = papers co-authored together Carl Eberhart links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197042
2 196932
3 197225
4 197322
5 196922
6 196820
7 197919
8 197818
9 197211
10 197811
11 19789
12 19779
13 19818
14 19698
15 19766
16 19795
17 19725
18 19715
19 19844
20 19743

About Carl Eberhart

Carl Eberhart is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mathematical Physics, Management Science and Operations Research and Applied Mathematics, having authored 31 papers that have together received 298 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include semigroups and automata theory (10 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (10 papers), Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory (7 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (7 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (6 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (5 papers), Advanced Banach Space Theory (4 papers) and Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (185 citations), Mathematical Physics (146 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (42 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (120 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (68 citations). Carl Eberhart has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Poland. Frequent co-authors include John Selden, Janusz J. Charatonik, Sam B. Nadler, Charles W. Clark, Lael F. Kinch and John Mack. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Semigroup Forum, Journal of Algebra and Pacific Journal of Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact