Cara Ray

22 papers receiving 373 citations

Peers

Cara Ray
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Health 150
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 87
  • Modeling and Simulation 15
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 50
  • Sociology and Political Science 138
Replace Daniel O’Leary with:
Daniel O’Leary United States
Holly Knight United Kingdom
Steve Gallagher New Zealand
Jennifer Lin United States
Melissa Chu United States
Olakanmi Olagoke United States
Enjeline Hanafi Indonesia
Emily Dibble United States
Alice Wai Yi Leung Hong Kong
Helen Reid United Kingdom
Cara Ray relative to Daniel O’Leary United States Daniel O’Leary's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×16.7×
Daniel O’Leary · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cara Ray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cara Ray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cara Ray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cara Ray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cara Ray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cara Ray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cara Ray. The network helps show where Cara Ray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cara Ray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cara Ray Line = papers co-authored together Cara Ray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017237
2 201834
3 201626
4 201921
5 20199
6 20177
7 20197
8 20197
9 20156
10 20206
11 20215
12 20234
13 20194
14 20233
15 20213
16 20202
17 20212
18 20231
19 20231
20 20241

About Cara Ray

Cara Ray is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Cognitive Neuroscience, Health and Epidemiology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 389 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (6 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (2 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers) and Bone fractures and treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (150 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (87 citations), Modeling and Simulation (15 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (50 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (138 citations). Cara Ray has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Kala J. Melchiori, Jesse Graham, Robert A. Bednarczyk, Jeffrey R. Huntsinger, Saad B. Omer, Avnika B. Amin, Jeffrey R. Huntsinger, Laura D. Carbone, Bella Etingen and Frances M. Weaver. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Infection Control, Spinal Cord, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation and Emotion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact