Candace Smith

28 papers receiving 229 citations

Peers

Candace Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 14
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 4
  • Ophthalmology 26
  • Pharmacology 44
  • Research and Theory 2
Replace Chia‐Jen Shih with:
Chia‐Jen Shih Taiwan
Dae‐Sung Kyoung South Korea
Banu Eriş Gülbay Türkiye
Bogdan Vlacho Spain
Naveen Seecheran Trinidad and Tobago
Pengmei Li China
Hanny Yeshua Israel
R Turner United Kingdom
Natapong Kosachunhanun Thailand
Yenh-Chen Hsein Taiwan
Candace Smith relative to Chia‐Jen Shih Taiwan Chia‐Jen Shih's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Chia‐Jen Shih · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Candace Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Candace Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Candace Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Candace Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Candace Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Candace Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Candace Smith. The network helps show where Candace Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Candace Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Candace Smith Line = papers co-authored together Candace Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200052
2 200126
3 199124
4 199321
5 201515
6 201314
7 20159
8 19969
9 20118
10 20128
11 20148
12 19967
13
External quality assurance committee for drug information services.
19907
14 20114
15 20014
16 20214
17 20114
18 20212
19 19952
20 19902

About Candace Smith

Candace Smith is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Pharmacology, Surgery, Psychiatry and Mental health and Infectious Diseases, having authored 29 papers that have together received 238 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (3 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (3 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (3 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (3 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (2 papers), Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (2 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (14 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (4 citations), Ophthalmology (26 citations), Pharmacology (44 citations) and Research and Theory (2 citations). Candace Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Iraq and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include John Birk, Michael Lehrer, Gail M. Comer, Joseph C. Anderson, Miriam A. Smith, Carol Singer, Tran H. Tran, Leonard J. Rossoff, Michael H. Miller and John A. Sorenson. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Care Medicine, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Clinical Infectious Diseases and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact