Candace Smith

29 papers receiving 248 citations

Peers

Candace Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 4
  • Ophthalmology 24
  • Pharmacology 42
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 7
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 45
Replace Soon Kil Kwon with:
Soon Kil Kwon South Korea
François Chast France
Ellen L. Graham United States
Mona Hegazy Egypt
E.S. Sous United States
Chia‐Jen Shih Taiwan
I‐Ching Kuo Taiwan
Masoud Shirmohammadi Iran
Jan Stålhammar Sweden
Chih‐Kuang Liu Taiwan
Candace Smith relative to Soon Kil Kwon South Korea Soon Kil Kwon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Soon Kil Kwon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Candace Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Candace Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Candace Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Candace Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Candace Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Candace Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Candace Smith. The network helps show where Candace Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Candace Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Candace Smith Line = papers co-authored together Candace Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200057
2 200128
3 199126
4 199322
5 201317
6 201516
7 199610
8 20159
9 20119
10 20148
11 20128
12
External quality assurance committee for drug information services.
19908
13 19967
14 20115
15 19935
16 20214
17 20114
18 20014
19 20242
20 20212

About Candace Smith

Candace Smith is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology, Infectious Diseases and Surgery, having authored 30 papers that have together received 263 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (3 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (3 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (3 papers), Celiac Disease Research and Management (2 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (2 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (2 papers) and Ocular Infections and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (4 citations), Ophthalmology (24 citations), Pharmacology (42 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (7 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (45 citations). Candace Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include John Birk, Gail M. Comer, Joseph C. Anderson, Michael Lehrer, Tran H. Tran, Leonard J. Rossoff, Miriam A. Smith, John A. Sorenson, Eileen Hilton and Irving H. Gomolin. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Care Medicine, American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Epilepsy & Behavior and ˜The œAmerican journal of geriatric pharmacotherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact